Rethinking the Growth Conversation at the Executive Level

The relationship between CMOs and CFOs has historically been transactional. Marketing requested budgets. Finance approved or declined them. Strategic planning occurred in parallel rather than partnership.

That model no longer delivers competitive advantage. McKinsey's analysis demonstrates that companies with a single customer- or growth-oriented executive on the leadership team grow up to 2.3 times faster than organizations where multiple roles share these responsibilities without clear ownership. When CMOs and CFOs align around shared metrics, joint planning, and mutual accountability for growth, organizations unlock compounding returns. Google states that tighter CMO–CFO alignment can unlock 20–40% more financial upside, while Deloitte finds that 79% of the fastest-growing companies maintain C-suite leaders aligned on shared KPIs.

This matters more in 2026 than five years ago. Marketing budgets face intensified scrutiny as economic uncertainty compresses growth timelines. Finance teams demand proof of incremental impact rather than channel-level efficiency. AI-driven automation promises cost reduction but requires strategic investment frameworks to prevent organizations from optimizing the wrong outcomes. The CMO–CFO partnership is the critical mechanism for navigating this tension between disciplined capital allocation and sustained investment in demand creation.

Why CMO–CFO Alignment Matters More in 2026 and Beyond

Increased Capital Scrutiny Is Reshaping Marketing Investment Decisions

Deloitte’s 2023 CMO Survey shows marketing budgets have declined as a percentage of company revenue compared to prior years. At the same time, pressure from CEOs, boards, and CFOs to demonstrate value has increased significantly. According to The CMO Survey, pressure from CEOs rose from 51% to 61%, from boards from 33% to 50%, and from CFOs from 52% to 63% year over year.

In parallel, Spencer Stuart reports that the presence of CMOs in the Fortune 500 declined from 71% in 2023 to 66% in 2024. Growth leadership now operates under closer financial oversight, making alignment essential for role durability and strategic continuity.

Advanced Measurement and AI Demand Financial-Marketing Integration

AI-driven bidding systems, retail media platforms, and advanced attribution models generate granular performance data. However, measurement sophistication only strengthens performance when finance and marketing share definitions of return.

Modern measurement frameworks such as Marketing Mix Modeling have repeatedly shown their ability to improve investment outcomes. Studies of European financial institutions using MMM point to double-digit improvements in growth and media efficiency, with one organization exceeding its growth targets by 26% and boosting media efficiency by 38% through model-driven decisions.

Relevant report: 4 Experts Break Down the Hidden Potential of MMM, MTA and Incrementality Testing

Customer Metrics Now Directly Influence Enterprise Value and EBITDA Growth

Enterprise value increasingly reflects the durability and predictability of revenue. McKinsey’s research shows companies placing marketing at the core of growth strategy are twice as likely to achieve annual growth above 5%. . That performance advantage stems from how effectively customer economics are managed and measured.

Retention rates extend revenue duration, customer lifetime value sets acquisition thresholds, and brand strength supports pricing power and margin stability. Marketing influences these drivers; finance models their impact on cash flow and capital allocation. When both functions align on how customer metrics convert into financial outcomes, growth strategy translates directly into enterprise value.

The case of e.l.f. Beauty: Aligning Marketing Spend With EBITDA and Contribution Margin

At e.l.f. Beauty, the partnership between CMO Kory Marchisotto and CFO Mandy Fields demonstrates how finance and growth leadership can scale both revenue and margins simultaneously. The two leaders aligned early on the principle that marketing investment should be treated as a driver of net sales and long-term value, not as a discretionary expense.

That shared framework supported a significant increase in marketing investment - rising from roughly 7% of net sales in 2019 to over 20% in later years - while maintaining financial discipline. The outcome: 28% sales growth and a 26% increase in adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2024. The results reflect structured alignment between capital allocation and customer growth, not isolated campaign success.

Building Effective CMO–CFO Partnerships in Practice

Build Shared Measurement Frameworks That Bridge Marketing and Finance

Strong collaboration starts with agreement on what success looks like. CMOs and CFOs need to build measurement systems together that work for both marketing and financial goals. This means moving past basic metrics like click-through rates or cost-per-acquisition to focus on business results: incremental revenue, customer lifetime value, and margin contribution.

Steps to align marketing measurement with revenue, ROI, and EBITDA:

· Map the current disconnect: Document which metrics marketing reports to leadership versus which metrics finance uses to evaluate marketing performance - identify where these diverge and why

· Co-create 3-5 primary business outcome metrics with your CFO that both functions will use: include at least one revenue metric (incremental revenue, sales growth), one profitability metric (contribution margin, EBITDA impact), and one customer metric (acquisition cost, lifetime value, retention rate)

· Run quarterly cross-training workshops: Marketing learns contribution margin, capital efficiency, and payback periods; Finance learns brand equity, mental availability, and how customer preference converts to commercial outcomes

· Build unified dashboards using shared datasets for customer acquisition costs, lifetime value, and revenue attribution-ensure both teams see the same numbers in real time

Implement Joint Planning and Capital Allocation Cycles

Research from Google and Project X Initiative shows that fewer than half of marketing and finance leaders plan and review together. This disconnect creates misalignment early. Marketing plans developed without finance input may overlook capital constraints and profitability thresholds. Budgets set without marketing participation may underfund growth priorities. Joint planning brings both functions together to align growth targets, capital allocation, success metrics, and review cadence.

Steps to integrate marketing planning with revenue and capital strategy:

· Synchronize planning calendars: Align marketing cycles with financial planning and board reporting schedules to ensure growth plans reflect capital realities.

· Build business cases collaboratively: Involve finance from the start to embed financial rigor into proposals rather than applying it afterward.

· Establish monthly forward-looking reviews: Assess performance against shared metrics and adjust investments in real time.

· Assign cross-functional liaisons: Include finance in marketing planning sessions and marketing in budget reviews to sustain alignment.

Connect Marketing Investment to Enterprise Value Creation

CFOs focus on enterprise value and runway - the company’s ability to generate sufficient value to meet investor expectations or reach the next milestone. Marketing leaders who link their strategy to these priorities position themselves as growth partners rather than resource requesters.

This requires understanding how marketing influences annual contract value, net revenue retention, CAC payback, and revenue efficiency. Leaders who clearly show how initiatives improve unit economics or accelerate time-to-value demonstrate fluency in the financial metrics boards use to assess performance.

Steps to connect marketing to enterprise value:

· Learn the 5-7 metrics your CFO and board use to evaluate company health: Ask directly which metrics matter most (ARR growth rate, Rule of 40, CAC payback period, net dollar retention, revenue efficiency) and how they're calculated

· Map each major marketing program to enterprise value drivers: Document how it influences customer acquisition efficiency, net revenue retention, time to first value, or expansion into higher-margin segments - make these connections explicit in all planning documents

· Create a marketing portfolio with three investment categories: proven programs with predictable returns, growth initiatives with measurable hypotheses, and exploratory work for discovering new opportunities - each with clear success criteria and evaluation timelines

· Lead board presentations with business outcomes: Start board discussions with revenue, margin, and lifetime value impact and use marketing metrics to explain how those outcomes were achieved.

Read our case study to see how a global luxury retailer unlocked $30M in additional profit by aligning performance marketing with contribution margin and customer lifetime value.

Invest in Data Infrastructure That Enables Collaboration

One-third of finance leaders cite data integration issues as a major challenge in collaborating with marketing teams. When both functions operate from different data sources, discrepancies arise in how customer behavior, campaign performance, and business impact get interpreted. These discrepancies erode trust and create unnecessary friction in resource allocation discussions.

Steps to build a unified marketing and finance data infrastructure:

· Conduct a data fragmentation audit: Identify all systems where marketing and finance data currently live, document which customer, campaign, and revenue data exists in which systems, and map where reporting discrepancies occur and why

· Define shared data standards: Both teams must agree on definitions - What counts as a customer? When does acquisition occur? How do we attribute revenue? How do we calculate lifetime value? - and document these formally for consistent use

· Invest in unified analytics platforms: Consolidate customer data, campaign performance, and financial outcomes into platforms both teams can access - the goal is shared analysis and reporting from the same underlying data, not forcing everyone to use identical tools

CMO–CFO Alignment as a Structural Competitive Advantage

The CMO–CFO partnership now defines how effectively organisations convert growth ambition into financial performance. Data from McKinsey, Google, Deloitte, and The CMO Survey consistently show that alignment at the executive level correlates with faster revenue expansion, stronger EBITDA growth, and more resilient enterprise value creation.

As capital scrutiny intensifies and measurement complexity increases, growth leadership can no longer operate in parallel with financial governance. The organisations that outperform will be those where demand creation and capital discipline operate within a shared framework of accountability. In 2026 and beyond, competitive advantage will increasingly belong to companies that institutionalise this partnership as a core operating principle rather than an annual budgeting exercise.

---

Unsure how to turn marketing investment into measurable financial impact? Reach out to us.

Relevant Insights:

· Presentation: Triangulation: How to Master Your Marketing Measurement and Maximize ROI

· Report: Great ROAS, Terrible Results: The Case for CLV-Centric Advertising

· Video: Is the Funnel in Digital Marketing Really Dead?

About Crealytics

Crealytics is an award-winning full-funnel digital marketing agency fueling the profitable growth of over 100 well-known B2C and B2B businesses, including ASOS, The Hut Group, Staples and Urban Outfitters. A global company with an inclusive team of 100+ international employees, we operate from our hubs in Berlin, New York, Chicago, London, and Mumbai.